Continue to article content I am a gay marriage advocate. So why do I spend so much of my time arguing about polygamy? Opposing the legalization of plural marriage should not be my burden, because gay marriage and polygamy are opposites, not equivalents. By allowing high-status men to hoard wives at the expense of lower-status men, polygamy withdraws the opportunity to marry from people who now have it; same-sex marriage, by contrast, extends the opportunity to marry to people who now lack it.
Better Than Nonmarriage When it comes to gay marriage, says Jonathan Rauch, what you think of marriage is more important than what you think of gays. Continued from Page 1 This is the beginning of the gay responsibility agenda and the end of the gay rights agenda.
It's about people being asked to be treated as adults.
The fundamental responsibility that distinguishes an adult from a child is the responsibility to care for somebody else. Do you think gay-marriage advocates have done a good job of presenting the issue? It's presented as a civil-rights issue and that's important. It's just not sufficient.
It's also a family policy issue and it's a morality issue. I don't think gay people can fully persuade America if we say, "It's a right we have. So what if you fear it will destroy marriage?
So I think it's very important for people to understand that gay marriage is not an attack on marriage. If anything, it's likely to reinvigorate marriage by reinforcing its core principle that sex, love and marriage should go together-no exclusions, no exceptions. That's a principle we've gotten way away from, thanks to heterosexual abuse of marriage in the last 30 years.
It's ironic to hear gay people who want into that traditional, conservative institution being told they're the threat. Many people say, "Yes intellectually I think so but for some reason it just bugs me.
Do you find people who just sort of say, "It makes me uncomfortable. This is a multi-millennium institution, which in Western culture is always between men and women.
This is our bedrock institution of society and you don't mess with it lightly. It would be way too glib to say it's a civil right, let's just do it. That's why I favor the state-by-state approach.
Plant the seed in the soil that's receptive and I think it will demonstrate very quickly that it's a positive sum game. Good for gays and for straights and for marriage. You stress love, but for you the clincher seems to be the function of marriage in society, in an almost mechanistic way.
For me, the core purpose of marriage is to create family for everybody. That is the constant of marriage in our society.
|Jonathan Rauch’s Denial | Public Discourse||Well, you got the question right the first time.|
|Jonathan Rauch Marriage Porn Gay Videos | tranceformingnlp.com||His basic premise is that marriage is the fundamental institution of society; it provides the main mechanism for harnessing the recklessness of young males, provides the most stable environment for raising children, and is the gold standard of commitment in a relationship.|
|Jonathan Rauch - Wikipedia||Thoughtful and convincingly argued. Rauch's impressive book is as enthusiastic an to marriage as anyone.|
|Frequently bought together||Better Than Nonmarriage When it comes to gay marriage, says Jonathan Rauch, what you think of marriage is more important than what you think of gays. Jonathan Rauch, the vice president of the Independent Gay Forum, is a prolific writer on public policy issues.|
|An Argument For Same-Sex Marriage: An Interview with Jonathan Rauch | Pew Research Center||Print I am a gay marriage advocate. So why do I spend so much of my time arguing about polygamy?|
You don't have to have kids. You don't have to be fertile.
The impact of legal same-sex marriage likely looks much different in, say, Mississippi than it does in Massachusetts. And it is, as Rauch is careful to point out, still too early to tell how same. Letting gay couples get married redefines marriage. Opponents of same-sex marriage argue that, with few exceptions, marriage has always been about uniting the two sexes and linking mother and father to children. Change that, and marriage ceases to be marriage. True premise, false conclusion. 1. Letting gay couples get married redefines marriage. Opponents of same-sex marriage argue that, with few exceptions, marriage has always been about uniting the two sexes and linking mother and father to children. Change that, and marriage ceases to be marriage. True premise, false conclusion.
But as a spouse you do have to be there-that's expected. And that's where society's interest lie. At some level society says, "Well, it's nice if people in a family love each other, but even if they don't if they are there for each other that's what we care about.
How do you see this rolling out? You let the states work it out individually. Initially, Massachusetts is court ordered, but I think there's a very good chance that in the public in Massachusetts will support it in a constitutional referendum.
Within ten years it's a pretty good bet that at least one state, maybe California for instance, will adopt gay marriage the old fashioned way--not through the courts, but they'll pass a bill and the governor will sign it.William Meezan and Jonathan Rauch Summary Same-sex marriage, barely on the political radar a decade ago, is a reality in America.
How will couples, Vermont and Connecticut are offering civil unions, and several states offer partner- Jonathan Rauch, argue that same-sex mar-riage will signal the government’s (and soci-. Articles by Jonathan Rauch at Prospect Magazine; Video of debate between Rauch and David Blankenhorn on the issue of gay marriage on tranceformingnlp.com; tranceformingnlp.com "New York Times correction: Hell is not other people at breakfast".
Craig Silverman. (March 28, ) Roberts, Russ (September 1, ). "Rauch on the Volt, Risk, and Corporate . Feb 22, · Jonathan Rauch is a guest scholar at the Brookings Institution and the author of “Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good for Gays, Good for Straights and Good for America.”.
In May , gay marriage became legal in Massachusetts, but it remains a divisive and contentious issue across America. As liberals and conservatives mobilize around this issue, no one has come forward with a more compelling, comprehensive, and readable case for gay marriage than Jonathan Rauch.
Gay marriage why it is good for gays, good for straights, and good for america [jonathan rauch] on *free* shipping on qualifying tranceformingnlp.comtful and convincingly tranceformingnlp.com's impressive book is as enthusiastic an to marriage as tranceformingnlp.com's no reason why you should ever have heard of tranceformingnlp.com it are placed extra supplies of silver and small.
When it comes to gay marriage, says Jonathan Rauch, what you think of marriage is more important than what you think of gays. Continued from Page 1 This is the beginning of the gay responsibility.